Medical News – Tarrant County Physician Online

Let’s Talk About Money: Understanding Physician Practice Structures

TCU Student Article

By Prisca Mbonu, MS-IV

This article was originally published in the January/February 2026 issue of Tarrant County Physician.

During my medical school’s Preparation for Practice course, we examined the multidimensional aspects of the medical profession, which included everything from the business of medicine to health equity, patient safety, public health, and communication. One session, titled “Health System Structure and Why It Matters,” stood out as particularly interesting. In this session, we explored the complexities of health systems, such as the features, incentives, and organizational models that influence physician practice structures. We examined the advantages and disadvantages of various models from the perspectives of both physicians and patients, delving into topics such as compensation structures and the trade-offs of different practice settings.

There are various paths for physicians to consider when choosing their practice structure. Private practices offer autonomy but come with financial risks and administrative burdens. On the other hand, hospital or health system employment provides stability and resources, but often at the cost of clinical independence. Payer-owned practices emphasize cost-effective care but may create ethical tensions due to insurance policies, while corporate-owned practices promise growth and potential equality but can impose pressures to meet financial targets. Corporate entities like health plans, venture capital investors, private equity firms, and large employers are also rapidly acquiring physician practices, outpacing hospital ownership and fundamentally reshaping the employment model.¹ By 2022, 26.4 percent of physician practices were owned by corporations, compared to 27.2 percent owned by hospitals.² This shift is a game-changer both for how physicians practice and how patients receive care.

Physicians also have the option of working within nonprofit, for-profit, government-owned, or academic medical centers, each offering distinct advantages. Nonprofit institutions purport to prioritize community service while reinvesting surpluses into patient care and public health. For-profit institutions may emphasize efficiency and profitability, often with the goal of expanding services or increasing shareholder returns. Government hospitals emphasize serving specific populations, such as veterans, while academic centers integrate patient care with education, research, and innovation. Evidently, these organizational models encompass substantial variation in governance, incentive structures, and day-to-day clinical realities, requiring physicians to navigate differing priorities as they define their professional identities.

It is important to note, however, that the stated missions and structural principles of these practice and ownership models do not always reflect how organizations operate in practice. Considerable overlap and, at times, incongruence exist across settings. For example, nonprofit and academic centers may face financial pressures that shape productivity expectations and revenue-driven strategies, while for-profit or corporate-owned practices may support high-quality, mission-driven care despite profit-oriented frameworks. These dynamics are often influenced by broader market forces, regulatory constraints, leadership, and other contextual factors.

As a medical student preparing for my future, I find myself grappling with several important questions: Which organizational structure aligns best with my values as a physician and an individual? Should I work for someone else, or would I prefer to be “my own boss”? What will financially benefit me as a physician? How will my work-life balance be affected, especially as a woman considering starting a family? How will these choices impact my autonomy, how I’m able to practice my ethical values, and the care I can provide to patients? These questions loom large and require a great deal of nuanced thought. While I don’t yet have all the answers, I am grateful for the opportunity to begin to reflect on these questions as I plan my career trajectory.

In a world where medicine is increasingly intertwined with business, we can no longer shy away from conversations about compensation and career structure. Many of the physician-led panelists at the session emphasized how essential this knowledge is—something they wish they had received earlier in their training. For medical students who will likely graduate with substantial student loan debt, these conversations also carry important financial implications. Overall, the course session on health system structures provided insights into the diverse organizational and financial models shaping both our future careers and patient care. Understanding these options is crucial in helping us determine not only how we want to work, but who we want to be as physicians and individuals.

References:

AHA Center for Health Innovation, Evolving Physician-Practice Ownership Models: Implications and Considerations for Hospitals and Health Systems, Market Insights Report (2021), https://www.aha.org/system/files/media/file/2020/02/Market_Insights_MD_Ownership_Models.pdf
Dailey, Eliza, and Sarah Roller. “Implications of the New Era of Physician Employment: 2023 Update on the Physician Landscape.” Advisory Board. April 1, 2023. Updated May 12, 2023. https://www.advisory.com/topics/physician/2023/04/a-new-era-of-physician-employment

TCMS Committees and Programs Review: Find Your Passion and Join Us in Making a Difference in Medicine

Feature Article

By TCMS Staff

This article was originally published in the January/February 2026 issue of Tarrant County Physician.

There are a variety of reasons that doctors choose to join TCMS; usually, new members will point to one defining thing that encouraged them to get involved. Perhaps they view our advocacy as critical, or they believe that we provide important networking opportunities. Maybe they wanted help with billing or more extensive chances for leadership roles. But whatever reason brought them here, when doctors choose to actively participate in the society, they find there are many more reasons to be part of TCMS than the one that drew them in the first place.

So here is our committees and programs review, your chance to learn of the opportunities that lie before you. We have a number of specialty committees and programs you can participate in, and we encourage you to join the one you find most compelling to use it as a springboard for upping your impact on medicine.

Allied Health Scholarship Committee
TCMS and its members, in partnership with TCMS Alliance, have an exciting opportunity to support the education access of allied health students through the Allied Health Scholarship Committee. This committee awards scholarships to qualified undergraduate students in Tarrant County who are actively enrolled in allied health training programs. It meets three times a year to discuss the applications received, choose the preliminary interviewers, interview the chosen candidates, and then decide on what amount is given to each final scholarship recipient. A student is also chosen to receive the Murphy Award—the largest monetary amount of all the scholarships offered—named after the donor, James A. Murphy, MD.

In 2025, the committee awarded $49,400 to students based on financial need and scholastic achievement. This was divided between 17 students from four different Tarrant County colleges and universities—all of whom we believe will make a big impact on the patients of Tarrant County with their future careers! We look forward to 2026 and the opportunity to meet and connect with even more schools, shaping the future for allied health students in our county. To get involved or get more information, contact Melody Briggs at mbriggs@tcms.org.

Board of Advisors
Each month, our executive committee meets to discuss the highlights of the healthcare community, the progress on TCMS projects, and goals for the future. When you participate with the Board of Advisors, you have a chance to get a full picture of TCMS and its role in Tarrant County, including its partnership with public health, emergency services, medical schools, residency training programs, charitable organizations, and local community leaders. This gives you a front-row seat in the efforts made to advocate on behalf of physicians
This monthly gathering is open to member physicians, residents, students, and other healthcare personnel. For more information on attending, email Melody Briggs at mbriggs@tcms.org.

Ethics Consortium
The Ethics Consortium meets monthly and is a diverse, non-partisan group of people interested in healthcare and ethics. Its mission is to improve the health and well-being of the diverse communities that make up North Texas by assisting in the application of ethical values to current healthcare issues through educational programming and advocacy efforts that encourage civil conversation and dialogue.

Healthcare in a Civil Society is an annual forum that seeks to engage leaders of varying perspectives in a civil conversation that focuses on the healthcare issues that are important to our community and is devoid of the rhetoric that often undermines these conversations in the media. This year’s event focuses on caring for the whole patient and takes a close look at where spirituality and the delivery of care intersect. The event will include a breakout session for audience participation and engagement and a panel discussion featuring leaders from various sectors to further the conversation. If you are interested in joining or would like more information on the Ethics Consortium, call TCMS at (817) 732-2825.

Legislative Committee
The Legislative Committee works to build the critical relationships necessary for effective medical advocacy. Though the committee certainly participates in the First Tuesdays at the Capitol events during the legislative session, it is also committed to fostering relationships with legislators and educating them on the issues year-round. In addition, for physicians who would like to get involved but feel unsure about talking to legislators themselves, it’s a great opportunity to build the knowledge and skillset to be a powerful advocate on behalf of your patients and your practice. You are surrounded by expert advocates! Members of the committee also make up a ready response team for issues that may arise between sessions, allowing TCMS to quickly navigate legislative challenges. For more information about the Legislative Committee and its goals, contact Brian Swift at bswift@tcms.org.

Committee on Physician Health and Wellness
The TCMS Committee on Physician Health and Wellness (PHW) promotes the health and well-being of physicians, recognizing that physicians are at least as vulnerable, if not more, to issues of substance abuse (including alcoholism) and mental disorders as their patients. The committee supports the early recognition, evaluation, and treatment of physicians with these conditions, and their monitored recovery. As part of this, the committee supports the work and activities of the Texas Physician Health Program and the Texas Medical Board.
The function of the PHW Committee is three-fold: 1) to promote physician health and well-being; 2) to ensure safe patient care by identifying physicians who may have potentially impairing conditions; and 3) to advocate for physicians while maintaining confidentiality and the highest ethical standards.

As advocates, the committee members help with interventions, referrals for evaluation and treatment, if necessary, and monitor attendees upon their return from treatment. It supports widespread education for physicians, family members, and support staff regarding possible impairments.

Through the TMA PHW Assistance Fund, financial assistance is available to physicians who cannot afford treatment for depression, chemical dependency, or other problems or whose families need short-term living expenses while a physician receives treatment. Donations to the fund are appreciated and are tax-deductible.

Our local committee consists of physicians who have special interest and experience in supporting those who are struggling, and it is available to consult with individuals and institutions locally that have questions or problems in this area. For more information about how you can participate or receive assistance, contact Kathryn Keaton at kkeaton@tcms.org.

Project Access Tarrant County
Project Access was formed in 2011 to facilitate surgical and specialty care to low-income, uninsured residents of Tarrant County who do not qualify for county or other resources. Since then, PATC has coordinated over $22 million in donated healthcare services, helping thousands of patients access life-changing and life-saving treatment.

Physician volunteers partner with PATC by seeing a limited number of patients in the comfort of their own office and in the course of their normal clinic day. Volunteers determine how many patients they are able to accept each year, and surgery is scheduled at facilities where volunteers have existing privileges. All care coordination including hospital and ancillary services is provided by Project Access staff so the physicians can focus on providing care.

PATC’s highest areas of need are general surgery, breast surgery, gynecology, orthopedic surgery (hips and knees), and pulmonology; although all specialties are always welcome. By volunteering with PATC, physicians play a critical role in improving health outcomes for patients who would otherwise go without care, while strengthening the health and well-being of our local community.
You are invited to learn more about how your expertise can make a meaningful difference—on your terms, within your existing practice, and with full support from the experienced PATC team. To learn more, contact Kathryn Keaton at kkeaton@tcms.org.

Publications Committee
The Publications Committee meets bimonthly to review submissions for TCMS’s journal, the Tarrant County Physician. All TCMS members are welcome to submit articles for consideration. The committee is devoted to selecting content that is meaningful to our readers—the medical community throughout Tarrant County.

We are incredibly grateful not only for our bimonthly authors, but also for those who write feature articles. From topics spanning the practice of medicine and legislative issues to anecdotes about historical figures and unique excursions, many TCMS members have shared their interests through articles that were published in the journal. The committee members give a resounding “Thank you!” to all contributors, and they have two requests: send in more submissions and consider joining the committee. The only way the journal can successfully represent all TCMS physicians is if members from different backgrounds and experiences write about the things that are meaningful to them, and joining the team that reviews content allows you to augment the voice of your fellow physicians in a powerful way. If you are interested in joining the Publications Committee or submitting an article for review, please contact Allison Hunter at editor@tcms.org.

Women in Medicine Committee
The TCMS Women in Medicine Committee’s goal is to promote networking and collegiality and present ideas and solutions for issues specifically affecting female physicians in Tarrant County. Now several years into its formation, the committee’s events have provided platforms for empowering and educational speakers, round tables, and CMEs. And from time to time, mixers, soap making, and yoga have made the itinerary! To join the think-tank behind these events, contact Brian Swift at bswift@tcms.org.

We hope you found one or more groups that grabbed your attention. And if you’re still unsure, don’t worry! Click this link, mark the topics you find interesting, and we will send you more information about committees or programs where you can make a difference doing the things you care about.

Mental Health in Medicine: A Call to Lead

President’s Paragraph

By Cheryl Hurd, MD, TCMS President

This article was originally published in the January/February 2026 issue of Tarrant County Physician.

Hello everyone, my name is Cheryl Hurd, and it is my honor and privilege to serve as the 2026 TCMS president. I am a psychiatrist who has been in active practice for nearly twenty-five years, but I have also been a medical educator for the majority of that time. (I am also an English Lit major, so the “President’s Paragraph” is likely to become much longer than a paragraph. . . .) I want to thank the many presidents before me who have written articles and stories that have amused, enlightened, and inspired me. I admire the passion (and compassion) as well as the courage of my predecessors. I can only hope to aspire to the same level of dedication to my theme as they did to theirs.

My mission has always been to provide the highest quality and evidenced-based care to patients while training the next generation of physicians in best practices. Easy buzzwords to write, but they’re sincere nonetheless. As a psychiatrist, mental health is at the forefront of my mind. Mental health has long been marginalized, treated as secondary to physical illness, and burdened by stigma. Yet the evidence is clear: Mental health is inseparable from overall health, and its neglect undermines our patients, our communities, and ourselves.

I have chosen to make mental health advocacy the defining theme of my tenure. This is not just a matter of professional responsibility; it is a moral imperative. TCMS should be among those leading the way in ensuring that mental health is recognized as a cornerstone of care in this county and throughout the great state of Texas.

Millions of people struggle with depression, anxiety, trauma, and substance misuse; this includes us as physicians. Suicide remains a leading cause of death among young people, and burnout continues to erode the well-being of healthcare professionals. We still lose as many as 400 attending physicians to suicide a year.¹ Residents and medical students are facing the same challenges. These realities are not just statistics—they are the lived experiences of our patients, colleagues, families, and ourselves.

The pandemic further exposed the fragility of our mental health infrastructure. The sequelae of the pandemic included an explosion in mental health disorders across our country. Demand for services surged, yet access remained uneven despite the adoption of telepsychiatry. Rural communities, marginalized populations, and children bore disproportionate burdens. I was president of the medical staff at JPS from the beginning through the height of the pandemic, and I saw firsthand the devastation that was wrought on the physical and mental well-being of the healthcare workforce. My most important service as medical staff president during that time was to bolster our physicians and other providers, provide resources, give updates, and instill hope when despair seemed to overwhelm us. The infrastructure could not meet the demands, and it often still doesn’t.

So, I would like to focus on expanding equitable access to care for all; integrating mental health into primary care, schools, and workplaces; and leading a conversational shift that normalizes open discussions about mental health across our practices and communities. Through advocacy we can advance reforms that treat mental health with the same seriousness as physical illness, expand the workforce with training and support for all physicians (not just mandate PHQ-9 and GAD-7 questionnaires at every visit), strengthen school partnerships to provide early intervention, invest in community clinics, expand telehealth to close gaps in underserved areas, and promote research and innovation that drive evidence‑based solutions.

As physicians, we still carry unique credibility in shaping public discourse. When we speak openly about mental health—whether in clinical settings, community forums, policy debates, or even podcasts—we dismantle stigma and inspire change.

We must also look inward. Physician burnout and moral distress remain pressing concerns that negatively impact physician well-being. By prioritizing mental health within our own profession, we model resilience and compassion for the broader healthcare system. TMA, our state medical association, has developed many resources in service of our members for these very issues. Many county societies have done the same, as have we at TCMS. I encourage everyone to visit the Physician Wellness website and learn more about our efforts: https://www.tcam.org/physician-wellness.

I know that I am asking a lot of all of you, and it won’t be easy. There are many financial constraints and competing interests that limit the expansion of services. We have a workforce shortage that hinders access, and the stigma of mental illness persists (particularly when it is related to substance use disorders). Differences in healthcare policies and funding priorities can complicate efforts to expand mental health services, but collaboration can help bridge these divides. These challenges are not insurmountable. With advocacy, innovation, and determination, we can overcome them.

Mental health is about people. It is about the child struggling with anxiety, the veteran coping with trauma, the parent balancing stress, and the physician facing burnout. By focusing on mental health, we confirm that every individual’s well-being matters.

As president of our medical society, I call upon each of you—physicians, educators, researchers, and advocates—to join me in this work. Together, we can elevate mental health, ensuring that it is recognized as a fundamental component of healthiness and a shared responsibility of the medical community.

“What mental health needs is more sunlight, more candor, and more unashamed conversation.” —Glenn Close

References:

John Matheson, “Physician Suicide,” American College of Emergency Physicians https://www.acep.org/life-as-a-physician/wellness/wellness/wellness-week-articles/physician-suicide#:~:text=Each%20year%20in%20the%20U.S.,and%20alcohol%20and%20substance%20abuse;.

A DO Dilemma

TCOM Student Article

By Jared Sloan, OMS-II

This article was originally published in the January/February 2026 issue of Tarrant County Physician.

January to February can be a tough time for many people: The air is cold, holiday street lights are taken down, New Year’s resolutions are abandoned, and osteopathic medical students are deciding whether they want to take double the amount of national licensing exams. While taking the USMLE (United States Medical Licensing Examination) Steps 1 and 2 is not a new expectation of osteopathic students, recent changes, including the formation of a single accreditation system, which fully merged the previously separate osteopathic and allopathic residency accreditation pathways in 2020, as well as the transition of STEP 1 to pass/fail scoring, have left many students scratching their heads and biting their nails at the thought of even more high-stakes exams. Early in their education, students are forced to make a career-defining choice: Should I take both the DO and MD licensure exams if it improves my residency outlook?

Since 1995, osteopathic students have taken the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX) as their primary means of gaining licensure. With the large overlap in content between COMLEX and the USMLE (the main difference being the inclusion of osteopathic-specific content), many professional medical societies have stated that the COMLEX is a perfectly acceptable alternative to the USMLE. However, this decision truly lies with individual residencies. Typically, osteopathic students who take STEP do so because it is required for the residencies they are interested in. But for the many year-two students who have not decided on a specific specialty, myself included, this decision is far from simple. Although many of my classmates and I are drawn to specialties that are historically “DO-friendly,” we are also aware that there is still much of medicine we have yet to experience. Many students don’t discover the field of medicine they are passionate about until their clinical rotations, but we must decide to take STEP 1 before we ever step into those roles. Students feel that by choosing not to take STEP they are closing doors to future programs before they even know about them. Many feel it is wiser to “play it safe” by taking the extra licensing exam. At the heart of this dilemma is the tension between what is technically sufficient for licensure and what is perceived as necessary to remain competitive across an increasingly uncertain residency landscape.

Unfortunately, students seeking mentor guidance on this matter often hear conflicting opinions from faculty and experienced osteopathic physicians. With the advancement of the osteopathic profession, many mentors insist that students should not feel pressured to take unnecessary exams. Others concede that, while COMLEX is becoming more accepted, there remains a very real preference for the STEP exams. Students are left with ambiguous answers and are told what they already know, namely, that choosing to take the extra exam depends on what specialty they are interested in.

How does the new pass/fail status of STEP 1 impact this predicament? Now that allopathic schools emphasize STEP 2, should second-year students feel free to skip the stress of STEP 1 and take STEP 2 only if they feel it is necessary? Yes, and some do exactly that. Many, however, are terrified by the idea of taking what feels like the most important test of our lives without taking its predecessor. While the core competencies of COMLEX and USMLE are similar in many ways, it is well known that there are differences in the style of writing and focus areas between the exams. With so much riding on STEP 2, students continue to feel pressured to prepare as best they can, which includes taking STEP 1.

Regardless of which licensure a medical student takes, almost all students would agree that these exams are hard. Fatigue, stress, and financial cost all increase when students choose to take more national boards. I know that I, and many students, worry how this increased burden will impact our performance. Taking an extra exam means risking failure on our core licensing exam or risking failure on an exam that was never necessary in the first place. Ultimately, we as medical students are high achievers, and many of us are willing to put in this extra work if it means more opportunities in the future.

Despite numerous residencies stating that they will review a COMLEX Level 2 score under the single accreditation system, students remain keenly suspicious that STEP 2 functions as a silent requirement. DO students are left wishing that our standard licensing exams were fairly considered but realize there is no way to enforce a fair consideration of COMLEX. Looking ahead, many osteopathic students are hopeful for one of two future outcomes. The first possibility is that the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME) could move toward standardization with the USMLE (potentially by accepting a unified licensing exam supplemented by osteopathic-specific assessments). However, given the NBOME’s longstanding commitment to a distinct osteopathic licensure pathway, this outcome appears unlikely. What feels like the more plausible future is that COMLEX scores will become more routinely considered by residency programs as familiarity increases. While this shift may already be underway, it will take time to fully materialize. As a result, although future osteopathic students may ultimately face fewer barriers, for the foreseeable future, many cohorts will continue to navigate a residency application in which the expectation of STEP remains firmly in place. As I look toward my future, I see a wide range of possibilities, possibilities that may quietly close if I choose to ignore this silent requirement.

2026 Tarrant County Medical Society President Cheryl L. Hurd, MD

Feature Article

By Allison Howard Hunter

This article was originally published in the January/February 2026 issue of Tarrant County Physician.

Dr. Cheryl Hurd, a psychiatrist committed to both clinical care and medical education, believes that organized medicine is the foundation that supports every other part of medical practice. But she’ll be the first to admit that she didn’t realize its importance early on.

“I was a student member of TMA, but I never did anything,” she says. The same was true during her residency in Arizona. But after years of participation, Dr. Hurd’s advice for medical students and residents is simple: Don’t just join—get involved.

When she returned to Texas and entered private practice, it was as the only psychiatrist in her medical group. Feeling alone, she rejoined TMA and immediately found connection in colleagues, committees, and a whole psychiatry track of support she didn’t know she was missing. “The camaraderie was huge,” she says. “I finally didn’t feel like the only one.”

Dr. Hurd’s involvement in organized medicine also offered practical benefits: TMLT insurance, CME funding, and—most importantly—the chance to advocate. Advocacy, she says, is what allows physicians to push back against excessive regulation, protect physician-led teams, and fight for the future of the profession.

She’s candid about the challenges physicians face. “Healthcare is regulated more than almost any other industry,” she says. Yet advocacy has delivered real wins: tort reform, increased medical education funding, and—critically for her field—expanded mental health funding in Texas even during budget-cut years.
“That’s why advocacy matters,” she says. “It protects us, it protects our patients, and it keeps our profession alive.”

And, as she found, those who advocate for you also have your back at the toughest of times, sometimes in ways that are less obvious than legislative wins. In 2020, when physicians were on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic and PPE was scarce, putting healthcare professionals at greater risk, Dr. Hurd was surprised to receive a box from TCMS.

“I opened it up and it was five hundred N-95 masks,” she says. “Just this whole box of N-95s. And then there was an email. It was from TCMS, saying, ‘Hey, we’re trying to help you.’ And they sent it to every single member; they sent every member a box because they wanted to protect us.”

Dr. Hurd credits that support as the reason she got even more involved, leading to her serving as our 2026 TCMS president. She saw in TCMS a reflection of her own ideals—a mission to care for patients, physicians, and the physician-patient relationship.

But it is the physicians like Dr. Hurd who give our medical society its heart, inform its values, and guide its vision.

“Dr. Hurd is the intelligent and compassionate doctor that you would wish to take care of your dearest loved ones,” says Helene Alphonso, DO, a friend and mentee of Dr. Hurd. “As a mentor, she nurtures lifelong learning at every level of medical education. She advocates for her patients and fellow physicians with countless hours and innovative solutions. . . . We can’t wait to see how her leadership in the Tarrant County Medical Society will shape the future.”

Though Dr. Hurd is now passionate about all things medicine, growing up, she did not want to be a doctor—or a teacher or a dancer or even a veterinarian (though she does have a major love for animals). No—at six years old, Dr. Hurd was determined that she was going to be a lawyer. She held on to this dream all the way through college, where she earned both a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in English from SMU, still convinced that law school was her next step.

It was during those years of study that Dr. Hurd met her husband, Howard. They had a good plan: he would go to medical school, and she would go to law school. Still, she decided to defer for a year because his education was taking him to Houston, while Dr. Hurd’s was taking her to Austin. As newlyweds, this separation was hardly appealing, and with law school only taking three years against medical school’s four, the choice was easy for her to make.

Dr. Hurd had planned to work in editing or proofreading for the year, but with a competitive job market and no connections in a new city, she had a frustrating lack of success. One day, she asked her husband if she could join him for his classes to give her something to focus on aside from the unfriendly job market, so he brought her along. She was immediately enthralled.

“A couple of weeks into his school, and I’m sitting there in the classroom taking more notes than he is,” Dr. Hurd says, laughing. “And I just thought, ‘Wow—this is fascinating. Why did I never study this?’”

Quickly, her decision was made—medicine was her future. In a short time, a passion grew into something she knew would sustain her in the years ahead.
Dr. Hurd and her husband were both accepted to Texas Tech’s School of Medicine, so they made the move to Lubbock. A couple of years later, Howard matched to a general surgery residency in Temple, Texas, so she transferred to A&M College of Medicine to complete her clinical rotations. When she graduated in 1998, she began her psychiatry internship at Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center in Phoenix, Arizona. Her training was unique—a joint internal medicine and psychiatry program that allowed her to combine the specialties that most interested her.

After her internship and four years of residency, Dr. Hurd was more than ready to begin practicing as a fully qualified psychiatrist. She and her husband knew they wanted to come back to Texas—the question was simply where they would land. Having their friends and family here was a huge draw for the young couple, but they were also motivated by positive legislation for medicine.

“With tort reform in 2003—that’s when I graduated residency—I was thinking it would really be nice to not have escalating malpractice costs,” Dr. Hurd says. “They’d still get money if I actually did something wrong, but the goal was that all the frivolous lawsuits would go away. And by and large, they have.”

They settled in Brownwood, Texas, where Dr. Hurd set up a psychiatry solo-practice collaborating with a larger organization of specialists. She was the only psychiatrist in the area, and she also consulted at the county hospital. At first this kept Dr. Hurd quite busy, but her practice slowed down after the financial crash of 2008. Soon she moved to Fort Worth, where she joined UNT Health Science Center and UNT Health, although her clinical assignment was at JPS. She later transitioned to Acclaim Physician Group when it was formed, and she stayed there until 2022. Throughout that time, her role grew from serving as the consult medical director to being the psychiatry program director and vice chair of education.

Though she was involved in education through TCOM and JPS, she maintained an active full-time practice. However, when she began serving as TCU Burnett School of Medicine’s psychiatry clerkship director, she stepped back from her role at JPS and joined Connections Wellness in a part-time role.

“At Connections Wellness, I still have a clinical job where I see patients and precept students,” says Dr. Hurd. “And then I had my role as psychiatry clerkship director. I do the behavioral health year-one lectures, clinical skills, and things like that. So, I’m all things psychiatry at the School of Medicine.”

Though Dr. Hurd treasures her role within medical education, she did not seek it in the early days of her career. When opportunities first arose in education, she turned them down in favor of focusing on her clinical practice.

“I thought, ‘No, I’m just going to go out and save the world one patient at a time,’” she remembers. “‘I’ll do clinic and just be a doctor, be a practicing physician. That’s what I was trained for.’ When I started at JPS, I just thought I’d be a psych consultant like I was at the county hospital down in Brownwood. So, I show up, do my orientation, and they’re like, ‘Here’s your team.’

“I went, ‘Team? What team?’ I had a resident, I had an intern, I had students. I just tried to base my precepting on some of the best preceptors I’ve had in my training. So that’s how I got involved and learned that I really loved it.”

Much like her discovery of medicine, Dr. Hurd considers this unexpected assignment another act of serendipity—one that was to her benefit, as it was (and is) for the many residents and medical students who have been under her tutelage.

Her colleague, Debra Atkisson, MD, has seen Dr. Hurd make a big impact both in education and practice throughout her career.

“I have known her for more than fifteen years and have observed her dedication to her patients and the medical students and residents she has taught,” says Dr. Atkisson. “She has provided our community and the state of Texas with outstanding education about psychiatry. . . . We are very fortunate to have Dr. Hurd serve as our president for Tarrant County Medical Society.”

Dr. Hurd has had variety in the roles she has held throughout her career, but they have all hinged on one overarching goal: supporting mental health for physicians and patients alike. This has involved making petitions both to TMA and the Texas Medical Board, being involved in mental health legislation through First Tuesdays, and serving on councils and boards supporting mental health—including TMA’s Physician Health and Wellness Committee, where Dr. Hurd served for the maximum nine-year term, including two years as vice chair and two years as chair.

Though progress has been made in mental health support and treatment, she sees that much more lies ahead.

“I want to continue to work on reducing the stigma and also try and get more involvement in the community itself to support and encourage and grow mental health access.”

But the problem goes beyond the average patients—physicians struggle greatly when it comes to accessing mental health.

“We’re the last ones to go seek help,” she says. “There used to be punishment for physicians with their licensure when they were under treatment. So, they didn’t seek treatment, or they felt like they couldn’t be honest about treatment. And there’s been a huge effort to flip that narrative and get physicians to understand it’s actually okay to get treatment, and this is thanks to both the TMA and the Texas Society of Psychiatric Physicians, after much work and many, many years.”

As she begins her term as TCMS president, Dr. Hurd does so with the goal of continuing this mission.

“One of my goals is to get the community more informed of opportunities for mental health support,” she says. “We are also trying to work on increasing access and bringing more behavioral health and mental health programs to the area.”

Those who know her believe Dr. Hurd will thrive in this role and ably utilize the opportunities it provides.

“I knew of her leadership at the Texas Medical Association, where she served on the Physician Health and Wellness Committee,” says Angela Self, MD, who has been friends with Dr. Hurd for many years. “She works tirelessly for her patients and for the practice of medicine. . . . She sacrifices many hours volunteering, advocating for the improvement of healthcare for physicians and patients across the country.”

As Dr. Hurd looks toward the future, she does so remembering the many physicians who have impacted her career. Carol Nati, MD, was a great mentor for Dr. Hurd, especially during her time at JPS. Dr. Atkisson encouraged her to get involved with TCU’s School of Medicine and Connections Wellness, and Greg Phillips, MD, helped give Dr. Hurd the drive she needed to get more involved with TCMS. Dr. Hurd credits these physicians—alongside many others, and her ever-supportive family— for helping her become the doctor she is today.

Though medicine always keeps her busy, Dr. Hurd loves spending time with her husband; their two children, Dawna and Perry; and their dogs (they always have several, and there is usually a rescue in the mix). If she has a spare moment, you’ll probably find her reading a book—all genres are welcome!—or joining in a multiplayer computer game that her husband got her involved in years ago. She’s now the only one in her family that plays, but through it, she has developed a network of friends spanning the globe.

“It’s kind of fun to have long-term friendships that are not based on just your circle,” says Dr. Hurd. “It gets us out of our comfort zones in those boxes we live in, where we only do things with people who are pretty much like us.”
Dr. Hurd is eager to widen her scope of friends and colleagues even further in the year ahead as she partners with physicians and other change-makers to make a difference for medicine in Tarrant County and beyond.

“I’m excited to see what we accomplish for medicine in 2026,” she says. “There’s a lot of work to be done!”

Introducing MATRIX: Medical Assessments and Tools for Inclusive Xperiences

By Kathryn Keaton

IN 2019, TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES Foundation announced a new series of grant cycles: the Texas Health Community Impact grants. These grants are available to five regions, with specific focuses for each county based on their most recent Community Needs Assessment.

These two-year awards are made to local organizations that work collaboratively to serve specific zip codes and address health disparities and socioeconomic hardships in innovative ways. Past Tarrant projects funded include community gardens, mental health access, and culinary job training.

For the 2025–2026 grant cycle, the Foundation awarded $5 million to 18 projects across North Texas. Project Access Tarrant County is honored to be among these recipients for a total award of $385,662 over two years.

Partnering with Cornerstone Assistance Network (CAN) and Mission Arlington, the project will utilize enhanced technology, education, and a shared employee to affect radical change in the care of patients with diabetes and/or hypertension in five target zip codes: 76010, 76011, 76104, 76105, and 76119.

We are proud to introduce our project, MATRIX: Medical Assessments and Technology for Inclusive Xperiences.

The Project

Since PATC offers specialty medical and surgical care, our clinic partners are vital. Most patients come to PATC from a referral made by primary care, and those who do not are required, with PATC’s assistance, to establish a connection with primary care.

CAN and Mission Arlington are among PATC’s founding partners. Both clinics serve as medical homes. CAN serves mostly patients in Fort Worth (MATRIX target zip codes 76104, 76105, and 76119), and Mission Arlington serves mostly Arlington patients (MATRIX target zip codes 76010 and 76011). Combined, PATC, CAN, and Mission Arlington provide a spectrum of primary and specialty/surgical care.

Community Health Worker

The single biggest innovation with MATRIX is the addition of a Community Health Worker (CHW). And not just a CHW—but a shared CHW. Once this individual is hired, they will travel between PATC, CAN, and Mission Arlington, having “office hours” at each location. While some patients will meet with the CHW at the PATC office, most will have appointments at their primary care clinic—a place and location where they have an existing relationship and feel comfortable.

The CHW’s activities will be tailored to each patient. The CHW may assist with one-on-one diabetic or hypertension education, help with access to prescription assistance, arrange transportation to diabetic eye exams, or complete hospital paperwork for PATC surgeries. The cadence will vary, but each patient will have individual appointments with the CHW. In total, Cornerstone plans to serve 100 patients and Mission Arlington plans to serve 750 in this manner. CAN’s and Mission Arlington’s aim is that 65 percent of all patients with hypertension will have blood pressure readings below 140/90 and that 68 percent of all patients with diabetes will have an A1c below 9 by the end of the grant period.

Education

A recent Tarrant County Physician article briefly mentioned that a TCU medical student chose PATC as her site to complete her Scholarly Pursuits and Thesis (SPT) project.1,2 Alex Koehl, MPH, MS-I at TCU, brings her public health expertise to PATC in creating a series of classes pertaining to social determinants of health (SDOH) common to PATC patients.

The first class will occur in late March. This class will empower patients to ask questions to understand their disease and treatment and to speak up if they do not understand their instructions. Patients who are seen pro bono often feel that they do not have agency to advocate for themselves and ask questions, leading to confusion and misunderstandings that eventually cause non-compliance and a lack of resolution of their health condition. The MATRIX grant allows for meals and incentives, encouraging attendance. The series will be facilitated in both Fort Worth and Arlington. Future topics include how to open a bank account (sometimes required for hospital charity applications), how to read a prescription bottle, and how to navigate a patient portal.

Technology

Enhanced technology will answer some of the barriers we face with our patients. We recently received a separate grant that will cover the cost of CareMessage, a messaging platform for safety-net organizations to “increase access to care, improve clinical outcomes, and address social drivers of health.”3

CareMessage will allow PATC to schedule appointment reminders (that include the address with a Google map link!), respond in real-time to questions or concerns, and generally allow for texting instead of playing phone tag. In addition, CareMessage can automatically translate any message into one of dozens of languages, meaning that any PATC staﬀ member can communicate with any patient regardless of language proficiency.

CareMessage will not replace PATC’s personal touch—all initial contact and important information will be relayed by telephone. But for simple reminders and questions where a yes- or-no response is needed, a phone call is generally not necessary.

While the messaging feature is an exciting progression in PATC’s day-to- day operations, CareMessage can go much deeper and is vital to MATRIX’s future success.

CareMessage has several preloaded educational text series. Stephen Pullman, MS-I at TCU, has also chosen PATC as his SPT site. Stephen is vetting existing diabetes and hypertension modules. In addition, as training progresses, Stephen is documenting ideas for future education modules that we can create. By the conclusion of his project, we will have multiple avenues for patient education on both preventative care and chronic conditions.

The survey element is also vital to Alex’s project. With CareMessage, patients will complete pre- and post-surveys for our SDOH classes, measuring the attendees’ level of understanding before and after the material that can be reported to the Texas Health Community Impact Grant project management team. We will also use this for participant feedback to improve future curricula.

As with all innovation, this project will have adaptations, enhancements, and changes over the course of the next two years; but we know that the future is bright. With the THR Foundation’s endorsement, the collaboration with two historic partners, and the opportunity for enhanced technology, by the end of this grant period, significant change and improvement will be affected. We look forward to keeping you updated as MATRIX continues to progress.

References:

Kathryn Keaton, “Project Access Tarrant County: Growth in 2025,” Tarrant County Physician, January/ February 2025, 21–22.
“Scholarly Pursuit and Thesis: Burnett School of Medicine at TCU: Fort Worth, Texas,” Burnett School of Medicine at TCU, June 17, 2024, https:// mdschool.tcu.edu/empathetic-scholar/ scholarly-pursuit-and-thesis/.
“Patient Engagement for Improved Health Equity,” CareMessage, February 4, 2025, https://www.caremessage.org/.

Parents, Act Now: Pneumococcal Vaccines Protect Kids From Dangerous Diseases

Physicians highlight vaccine importance for kids under 2 years old

Texas physicians have a message for parents getting ready to send their kids to daycare or school – make sure your children are up to date on their pneumococcal vaccine. The vaccine prevents infectious diseases that spread easily through a cough or sneeze in crowded settings.

“It is important for infants to be immunized at a young age, typically 2, 4, 6, and 15 months of age, especially before daycare entry,” said Valerie Smith, MD, who is a pediatrician and chair of the Texas Medical Association (TMA) Council on Science and Public Health. She said very young children and older adults are most at risk for pneumococcus.

Many people, including young children, have pneumococcal bacteria in their nose or throat. The bacteria can cause noninvasive diseases like ear infections, but in some cases, it can develop into dangerous invasive diseases like meningitis.

“Physicians worry about pneumococcus because it can cause invasive disease spreading to the lungs, the blood stream, or the lining of the brain, which can lead to severe, life-threatening illnesses,” Dr. Smith said.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, when someone is affected by an invasive disease, germs invade parts of the body that are normally germ-free.

In Texas, nearly 2,000 invasive pneumococcal disease cases are reported each year.

TMA created a public awareness campaign, Vaccines Defend What Matters, reminding Texans to get their children’s vaccinations updated and to get the flu shot this fall.

“The new school year is an exciting time, but in addition to new clothes and school supplies, it is an important time for families to make sure their children are healthy and protected from vaccine preventable diseases,” Dr. Smith said. She recommends parents contact their primary care physician’s office for more information and guidance about the pneumococcal vaccine, as well as other vaccines children need for school.

TMA is the largest state medical society in the nation, representing more than 57,000 physician and medical student members. It is located in Austin and has 110 component county medical societies around the state. TMA’s key objective since 1853 is to improve the health of all Texans.

Tarrant County Public Health: Health Advisory Alert

An original message by Tarrant County Public Health announced on June 9, 2023.

Tarrant County Public Health (TCPH) is issuing this Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory to notify clinicians about a confirmed measles case in a Hood County resident in a Tarrant County Hospital. TCPH has worked closely with the facility to identify exposure to some patients and staff that occurred before measles was suspected. All exposed people have been contacted and advised to watch for signs and symptoms through June 22nd. TCPH collaborated with the facility and Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), to investigate and respond to this measles case and exposures.

Below is a forwarded HAN from DSHS with background information about the current measles case, information on measles and the importance of early recognition, diagnosis, and appropriate treatment. TCPH recommends that clinicians be on the alert for cases of measles that meet the case definition.

Due to the highly contagious nature of this disease, additional cases may occur. We advise clinicians to follow the recommendations below and report any suspected cases immediately to Tarrant County Public Health’s 24-hour reporting line at (817)321-5350, preferably while the patient is present.

Background

A young child who is a resident of Hood County was recently diagnosed with measles. The child had no history of travel to an area where measles is spreading and no known exposure to a person with measles. The child has been treated and is recovering.

This is the first confirmed case of measles in Texas since travel-related outbreaks in 2019, which led to 23 cases. Completion of the two-dose series of the measles vaccine is highly effective at preventing measles, however even vaccinated people may occasionally become infected.

Measles is a highly contagious respiratory illness. The virus is transmitted by direct contact with infectious droplets or by airborne spread when an infected person breathes, coughs, or sneezes. Measles virus can remain infectious in the air for up to two hours after an infected person leaves an area. The illness usually starts a week or two after someone is exposed with symptoms like a high fever, cough, runny nose and red, watery eyes. A few days later, the telltale rash breaks out as flat, red spots on the face and then spreads down the neck and trunk to the rest of the body. A person is contagious about four days before the rash appears to four days after. People with measles should stay home from work or school during that period.

The best way to prevent getting sick is to be immunized with two doses of the measles- containing vaccine, which is primarily administered as the combination of measles-mumps- rubella (MMR) vaccine. DSHS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend children receive one dose at 12 to 15 months of age and another at 4 to 6 years. Children too young to be vaccinated or who have only had one dose of vaccine are more likely to get infected and more likely to have severe complications if they do get sick.

Recommendations For Health Care Professionals:

Healthcare providers should consider measles in patients presenting with the following symptoms, particularly those who have traveled abroad or had contact with known measles cases:

• Fever ≥101°F (38.3°C) AND
• Generalized maculopapular rash lasting ≥3 days AND Rash begins at the hairline/scalp and progresses down the body
• Cough, runny nose, conjunctivitis OR Koplik spots (bluish-white specks or a red-rose background appearing on the buccal and labial mucosa usually opposite the molars)

Immediately report any suspected cases of measles to Tarrant County Public Health at our 24 hour hotline (817)321-5350) (dshs.texas.gov/idcu/investigation/conditions/contacts). If possible, please report while the patient is present to facilitate testing and the public health investigation, including follow-up of potential exposures.

Infection Control Precautions

Airborne precautious should be followed to reduce possible exposures in healthcare settings.
In urgent/emergency healthcare settings, suspected cases should be masked with a surgical mask and triaged quickly from waiting areas into a room with a closed door, airborne isolation precautions recommended. In other outpatient settings, suspected cases should be scheduled at the end of the day, if possible. Healthcare workers caring for patients suspected of having measles should use airborne infection control precautions. (www.cdc.gov/hicpac/2007IP/2007isolationPrecautions.html)
Since measles is so highly transmissible and can spread in health care settings, people who work in places like a doctor’s office or emergency room should have evidence of measles immunity to prevent any potential outbreak. (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/surv-manual/chpt07- measles.html#f21).

Diagnostic Testing

Testing for measles should be done for all suspected cases of measles at the time of the initial medical visit:
Measles PCR and serology (IgM and IgG) testing is available at both the Texas DSHS Laboratory in Austin and at commercial laboratories.
The Texas DSHS Laboratory can perform PCR testing on throat swabs (preferred) or nasopharyngeal swabs placed in viral transport media and serology on serum specimens.
DSHS strongly encourages providers to submit PCR specimens to the DSHS Laboratory because genotyping will be performed on positive PCR specimens, which can be helpful during outbreaks.
Providers should work with their local health department or DSHS regional office to coordinate testing at the DSHS laboratory to ensure specimens are submitted correctly and meet testing requirements.
Unless coordinated in advance, specimens may only be received during normal business hours Monday through Friday.

Recommendations for Public Health:

Control and Prevention Measures

Measles vaccination may prevent disease in exposed people if given within 72 hours of exposure. People 6 months and older who have not been fully vaccinated would be eligible for vaccination under those circumstances. It may provide some long-term protection but should be followed with a second vaccination at least one month later. Immune globulin (IG) may be indicated for some people but should not be used to control an outbreak.
Pregnant women, people with severe immunosuppression, and anyone with a previous anaphylactic reaction to a vaccine component should not get a measles vaccine.

Controlling Outbreaks in Group Settings

People with confirmed or suspected measles should stay home from school, work, and other group settings until after the fourth day of rash onset.
During an outbreak, people without documented immunity from vaccination or previous measles infection should be isolated from anyone with measles to protect those without immunity and control the outbreak. Additional information on school exclusion and readmission can be found at dshs.texas.gov/idps- home/school-communicable-disease-chart

Recommendations for the Public

If you think you have measles or have been exposed to someone with measles, isolate yourself from others and call your healthcare provider before arriving to be tested so they can prepare for your arrival without exposing other people to the virus. Measles is extremely contagious and can cause life-threatening illness to anyone who is not protected against the virus.

For More Information:

DEA Proposed Rules Address Telehealth Prescribing Post PHE

by Sean Price

Originally published by Texas Medical Association on March 8, 2023.

Physicians found new flexibility in prescribing controlled substances via telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Now that the public health emergency is ending, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has proposed new rules for prescribers it says could preserve some of those flexibilities “with appropriate safeguards.”

Among other things, the new rules – if finalized – would allow physicians and health care professionals to prescribe, without a face-to-face visit, a 30-day supply of Schedule III and Schedule IV non-narcotic controlled drugs, after which an in-person follow-up would be needed for any refill. This class of drugs is the least likely to result in drug abuse, according to DEA. The proposal also would allow for prescribing a 30-day supply of buprenorphine to treat opioid use disorder without an in-person evaluation or referral.

“Improved access to mental health and substance use disorder services through expanded telemedicine flexibilities will save lives,” Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra said in the announcement. “We still have millions of Americans, particularly those living in rural communities, who face difficulties accessing a doctor or health care provider in person.”

The agency emphasized that the rules do not affect telehealth services that do not involve controlled substance prescriptions. The Texas Medical Association is reviewing how the proposed regulations could interact with other federal and state regulations, says Shannon Vogel, TMA’s associate vice president of health information technology.

DEA has released summaries for both healthcare professionals and patients explaining how the proposed rules would affect prescription practices.

“This is a very good thing that they’re doing and a necessary thing” for access to care, said Mesquite pain management specialist C.M. Schade, MD, a former president of the Texas Pain Society.

Before the pandemic, physicians were limited in their telemedicine prescribing ability by the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008, he says. The act requires physicians to conduct at least one in-person medical evaluation of the patient before prescribing a controlled substance by means of the “internet,” which is defined to include telehealth.

“COVID did great things for telehealth, and one of them was breaking through the Ryan Haight Act,” Dr. Schade said.

Some policymakers and behavioral health advocates have expressed concern, however, that patients who need continuous medication therapy may have challenges obtaining an in-person visit within 30 days.

The rules were proposed on Feb. 24 and public comments are due on March 31. The agency has no set timeline for publishing the rules, though it is likely that will come before the PHE ends on May 11.

Physicians with questions and comments about the DEA changes or relevant state regulations can contact Ms. Vogel.

Linda Siy, MD, named Texas Family Physician of the Year

Linda Siy, MD, of Fort Worth, Texas, has been awarded the highest honor among Texas family doctors by the Texas Academy of Family Physicians. She was named the 2022 Texas Family Physician of the Year during TAFP’s Annual Session and Primary Care Summit in Grapevine on Oct. 29. Each year, patients and physicians nominate extraordinary family physicians throughout Texas who symbolize excellence and dedication in family medicine. A panel of TAFP members chooses one as the family physician of the year.

“It truly is an honor to join the ranks of those who have received this distinction, and I’m very humbled to be considered with those distinguished colleagues who previously were Family Physicians of the Year,” Siy said as she accepted the award.

Siy has been a family physician for over 30 years, and currently practices at John Peter Smith Health Network at the Northeast Medical Home in Tarrant County, a practice she’s been a part of since 1995. She is also faculty at the University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, the University of North Texas Health Science Center/Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, and the Texas Christian University Burnett School of Medicine.

Throughout her years in organized medicine, Siy has served on many committees and councils for both TAFP and the American Academy and has been president of the TAFP Foundation since 2017. She serves on the Acclaim Multispecialty Group’s Physician Board of Directors, and previously served as president of the Tarrant County Medical Society and TAFP’s Tarrant County chapter.

Siy has spent her career in medicine treating her loyal and multi-generational families of patients, many of whom are underserved, suffer from housing and food insecurity, and struggle with mental health and substance abuse. Many of her nominators mentioned her willingness to speak up and ask the questions others are too afraid to ask, as well as her dedication to teaching the next generation of family physicians.

“I think what’s kept me in the game for so long at the place where I work now are those rewarding relationships with your patients, with your staff, with your colleagues,” Siy said of her career in family medicine. “It’s really not a job. It’s a calling.”